github: https://github.com/Dovar66/DToast
通过Gradle引用本库
Step 1. Add the JitPack repository to your build file
Add it in your root build.gradle at the end of repositories:
allprojects { repositories { ... maven { url 'https://jitpack.io' } } }
Step 2. Add the dependency
dependencies { implementation 'com.github.Dovar66:DToast:1.0.5' }
正文
先看看使用系统Toast存在的问题:
1.当通知权限被关闭时在华为等手机上Toast不显示; 2.Toast的队列机制在不同手机上可能会不相同; 3.Toast的BadTokenException问题;
当发现系统Toast存在问题时,不少同学都会采用自定义的TYPE_TOAST弹窗来实现相同效果。虽然大部分情况下效果都是 OK的,但其实TYPE_TOAST弹窗依然存在兼容问题:
4.Android8.0之后的token null is not valid问题(实测部分机型问题); 5.Android7.1之后,不允许同时展示两个TYPE_TOAST弹窗(实测部分机型问题)。
那么,DToast使用的解决方案是:
1.通知权限未被关闭时,使用SystemToast(修复了问题2和问题3的系统Toast); 2.通知权限被关闭时,使用DovaToast(自定义的TYPE_TOAST弹窗); 3.当使用DovaToast出现token null is not valid时,尝试使用ActivityToast(自定义的TYPE_APPLICATION_ATTACHED_DIALOG 弹窗,只有当传入Context为Activity时,才会启用ActivityToast).
相信不少同学旧项目中封装的ToastUtil都是直接使用的ApplicationContext作为上下文,然后在需要弹窗的时候直接就是ToastUtil.show(str) ,这样的使用方式对于我们来说是最方便的啦。
当然,使用DToast你也依然可以沿用这种封装方式,但这种方式在下面这个场景中可能会无法成功展示出弹窗(该场景下原生Toast也一样无法弹出), 不过请放心不会导致应用崩溃,而且这个场景出现的概率较小,有以下几个必要条件:
1.通知栏权限被关闭(通知栏权限默认都是打开的) 2.非MIUI手机 3.你的应用设置的targetSdkVersion>=26 4.Android8.0以上的部分手机。
所以,如果你的应用targetSdkVersion>=26,又想要保证在所有场景下都能正常展示弹窗,那么请在DToast.make(context)时传入Activity作为上下文,这样在该场景下DToast会启用ActivityToast展示出弹窗。而targetSdkVersion小于26的同学可以放心使用ApplicationContext创建DToast。
(想了解为什么需要区别对待targetSdkVersion26+?看看API26到底做了什么点击这里 如果你对targetSdkVersion的概念有疑问点击这里)
接下来再详细分析下上面提到的五个问题:
问题一:关闭通知权限时Toast不显示
看下方Toast源码中的show()方法,通过AIDL获取到INotificationManager,并将接下来的显示流程控制权 交给NotificationManagerService。 NMS中会对Toast进行权限校验,当通知权限校验不通过时,Toast将不做展示。 当然不同ROM中NMS可能会有不同,比如MIUI就对这部分内容进行了修改,所以小米手机关闭通知权限不会导致Toast不显示。 /** * Show the view for the specified duration. */ public void show() { if (mNextView == null) { throw new RuntimeException("setView must have been called"); } INotificationManager service = getService(); String pkg = mContext.getOpPackageName(); TN tn = mTN; tn.mNextView = mNextView; try { service.enqueueToast(pkg, tn, mDuration); } catch (RemoteException e) { // Empty } }
如何解决这个问题?只要能够绕过NotificationManagerService即可。
DovaToast通过使用TYPE_TOAST实现全局弹窗功能,不使用系统Toast,也没有使用NMS服务,因此不受通知权限限制。
问题二:系统Toast的队列机制在不同手机上可能会不相同
我找了四台设备,创建两个Gravity不同的Toast并调用show()方法,结果出现了四种展示效果: * 荣耀5C-android7.0(只看到展示第一个Toast) * 小米8-MIUI10(只看到展示第二个Toast,即新的Toast.show会中止当前Toast的展示) * 红米6pro-MIUI9(两个Toast同时展示) * 荣耀5C-android6.0(第一个TOAST展示完成后,第二个才开始展示)
造成这个问题的原因应该是各大厂商ROM中NMS维护Toast队列的逻辑有差异。 同样的,DToast内部也维护着自己的队列逻辑,保证在所有手机上使用DToast的效果相同。
DToast中多个弹窗连续出现时: 1.相同优先级时,会终止上一个,直接展示后一个; 2.不同优先级时,如果后一个的优先级更高则会终止上一个,直接展示后一个。
问题三:系统Toast的BadTokenException问题
Toast有个内部类 TN(extends ITransientNotification.Stub),调用Toast.show()时会将TN传递给NMS;
public void show() { if (mNextView == null) { throw new RuntimeException("setView must have been called"); } INotificationManager service = getService(); String pkg = mContext.getOpPackageName(); TN tn = mTN; tn.mNextView = mNextView; try { service.enqueueToast(pkg, tn, mDuration); } catch (RemoteException e) { // Empty } }
在NMS中会生成一个windowToken,并将windowToken给到WindowManagerService,WMS会暂时保存该token并用于之后的校验;
NotificationManagerService.java #enqueueToast源码:
synchronized (mToastQueue) { int callingPid = Binder.getCallingPid(); long callingId = Binder.clearCallingIdentity(); try { ToastRecord record; int index = indexOfToastLocked(pkg, callback); // If it's already in the queue, we update it in place, we don't // move it to the end of the queue. if (index >= 0) { record = mToastQueue.get(index); record.update(duration); } else { // Limit the number of toasts that any given package except the android // package can enqueue. Prevents DOS attacks and deals with leaks. if (!isSystemToast) { int count = 0; final int N = mToastQueue.size(); for (int i=0; i<N; i++) { final ToastRecord r = mToastQueue.get(i); if (r.pkg.equals(pkg)) { count++; if (count >= MAX_PACKAGE_NOTIFICATIONS) { Slog.e(TAG, "Package has already posted " + count + " toasts. Not showing more. Package=" + pkg); return; } } } } Binder token = new Binder();//生成一个token mWindowManagerInternal.addWindowToken(token, TYPE_TOAST, DEFAULT_DISPLAY); record = new ToastRecord(callingPid, pkg, callback, duration, token); mToastQueue.add(record); index = mToastQueue.size() - 1; keepProcessAliveIfNeededLocked(callingPid); } // If it's at index 0, it's the current toast. It doesn't matter if it's // new or just been updated. Call back and tell it to show itself. // If the callback fails, this will remove it from the list, so don't // assume that it's valid after this. if (index == 0) { showNextToastLocked(); } } finally { Binder.restoreCallingIdentity(callingId); } }
然后NMS通过调用TN.show(windowToken)回传token给TN;
/** * schedule handleShow into the right thread */ @Override public void show(IBinder windowToken) { if (localLOGV) Log.v(TAG, "SHOW: " + this); mHandler.obtainMessage(SHOW, windowToken).sendToTarget(); }
TN使用该token尝试向WindowManager中添加Toast视图(mParams.token = windowToken);
在API25的源码中,Toast的WindowManager.LayoutParams参数新增了一个token属性,用于对添加的窗口进行校验。
当param.token为空时,WindowManagerImpl会为其设置 DefaultToken;
@Override public void addView(@NonNull View view, @NonNull ViewGroup.LayoutParams params) { applyDefaultToken(params); mGlobal.addView(view, params, mContext.getDisplay(), mParentWindow); } private void applyDefaultToken(@NonNull ViewGroup.LayoutParams params) { // Only use the default token if we don't have a parent window. if (mDefaultToken != null && mParentWindow == null) { if (!(params instanceof WindowManager.LayoutParams)) { throw new IllegalArgumentException("Params must be WindowManager.LayoutParams"); } // Only use the default token if we don't already have a token. final WindowManager.LayoutParams wparams = (WindowManager.LayoutParams) params; if (wparams.token == null) { wparams.token = mDefaultToken; } } }
当WindowManager收到addView请求后会检查 mParams.token 是否有效,若有效则添加窗口展示,否则抛出BadTokenException异常.
switch (res) { case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_BAD_APP_TOKEN: case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_BAD_SUBWINDOW_TOKEN: throw new WindowManager.BadTokenException( "Unable to add window -- token " + attrs.token + " is not valid; is your activity running?"); case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_NOT_APP_TOKEN: throw new WindowManager.BadTokenException( "Unable to add window -- token " + attrs.token + " is not for an application"); case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_APP_EXITING: throw new WindowManager.BadTokenException( "Unable to add window -- app for token " + attrs.token + " is exiting"); case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_DUPLICATE_ADD: throw new WindowManager.BadTokenException( "Unable to add window -- window " + mWindow + " has already been added"); case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_STARTING_NOT_NEEDED: // Silently ignore -- we would have just removed it // right away, anyway. return; case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_MULTIPLE_SINGLETON: throw new WindowManager.BadTokenException("Unable to add window " + mWindow + " -- another window of type " + mWindowAttributes.type + " already exists"); case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_PERMISSION_DENIED: throw new WindowManager.BadTokenException("Unable to add window " + mWindow + " -- permission denied for window type " + mWindowAttributes.type); case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_INVALID_DISPLAY: throw new WindowManager.InvalidDisplayException("Unable to add window " + mWindow + " -- the specified display can not be found"); case WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_INVALID_TYPE: throw new WindowManager.InvalidDisplayException("Unable to add window " + mWindow + " -- the specified window type " + mWindowAttributes.type + " is not valid"); }
什么情况下windowToken会失效?
UI线程发生阻塞,导致TN.show()没有及时执行,当NotificationManager的检测超时后便会删除WMS中的该token,即造成token失效。
如何解决?
Google在API26中修复了这个问题,即增加了try-catch: // Since the notification manager service cancels the token right // after it notifies us to cancel the toast there is an inherent // race and we may attempt to add a window after the token has been // invalidated. Let us hedge against that. try { mWM.addView(mView, mParams); trySendAccessibilityEvent(); } catch (WindowManager.BadTokenException e) { /* ignore */ }
因此对于8.0之前的我们也需要做相同的处理。DToast是通过反射完成这个动作,具体看下方实现:
//捕获8.0之前Toast的BadTokenException,Google在Android 8.0的代码提交中修复了这个问题 private void hook(Toast toast) { try { Field sField_TN = Toast.class.getDeclaredField("mTN"); sField_TN.setAccessible(true); Field sField_TN_Handler = sField_TN.getType().getDeclaredField("mHandler"); sField_TN_Handler.setAccessible(true); Object tn = sField_TN.get(toast); Handler preHandler = (Handler) sField_TN_Handler.get(tn); sField_TN_Handler.set(tn, new SafelyHandlerWrapper(preHandler)); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } public class SafelyHandlerWrapper extends Handler { private Handler impl; public SafelyHandlerWrapper(Handler impl) { this.impl = impl; } @Override public void dispatchMessage(Message msg) { try { impl.dispatchMessage(msg); } catch (Exception e) { } } @Override public void handleMessage(Message msg) { impl.handleMessage(msg);//需要委托给原Handler执行 } }
问题四:Android8.0之后的token null is not valid问题
Android8.0后对WindowManager做了限制和修改,特别是TYPE_TOAST类型的窗口,必须要传递一个token用于校验。
API25:(PhoneWindowManager.java源码)
public int checkAddPermission(WindowManager.LayoutParams attrs, int[] outAppOp) { int type = attrs.type; outAppOp[0] = AppOpsManager.OP_NONE; if (!((type >= FIRST_APPLICATION_WINDOW && type <= LAST_APPLICATION_WINDOW) || (type >= FIRST_SUB_WINDOW && type <= LAST_SUB_WINDOW) || (type >= FIRST_SYSTEM_WINDOW && type <= LAST_SYSTEM_WINDOW))) { return WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_INVALID_TYPE; } if (type < FIRST_SYSTEM_WINDOW || type > LAST_SYSTEM_WINDOW) { // Window manager will make sure these are okay. return WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_OKAY; } String permission = null; switch (type) { case TYPE_TOAST: // XXX right now the app process has complete control over // this... should introduce a token to let the system // monitor/control what they are doing. outAppOp[0] = AppOpsManager.OP_TOAST_WINDOW; break; case TYPE_DREAM: case TYPE_INPUT_METHOD: case TYPE_WALLPAPER: case TYPE_PRIVATE_PRESENTATION: case TYPE_VOICE_INTERACTION: case TYPE_ACCESSIBILITY_OVERLAY: case TYPE_QS_DIALOG: // The window manager will check these. break; case TYPE_PHONE: case TYPE_PRIORITY_PHONE: case TYPE_SYSTEM_ALERT: case TYPE_SYSTEM_ERROR: case TYPE_SYSTEM_OVERLAY: permission = android.Manifest.permission.SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW; outAppOp[0] = AppOpsManager.OP_SYSTEM_ALERT_WINDOW; break; default: permission = android.Manifest.permission.INTERNAL_SYSTEM_WINDOW; } if (permission != null) { ... } return WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_OKAY; }
API26:(PhoneWindowManager.java源码)
public int checkAddPermission(WindowManager.LayoutParams attrs, int[] outAppOp) { int type = attrs.type; outAppOp[0] = AppOpsManager.OP_NONE; if (!((type >= FIRST_APPLICATION_WINDOW && type <= LAST_APPLICATION_WINDOW) || (type >= FIRST_SUB_WINDOW && type <= LAST_SUB_WINDOW) || (type >= FIRST_SYSTEM_WINDOW && type <= LAST_SYSTEM_WINDOW))) { return WindowManagerGlobal.ADD_INVALID_TYPE; } if (type < FIRST_SYSTEM_WINDOW || type > LAST_SYSTEM_WINDOW) { // Window manager will make sure these are okay. return ADD_OKAY; } if (!isSystemAlertWindowType(type)) { switch (type) { case TYPE_TOAST: // Only apps that target older than O SDK can add window without a token, after // that we require a token so apps cannot add toasts directly as the token is // added by the notification system. // Window manager does the checking for this. outAppOp[0] = OP_TOAST_WINDOW; return ADD_OKAY; case TYPE_DREAM: case TYPE_INPUT_METHOD: case TYPE_WALLPAPER: case TYPE_PRESENTATION: case TYPE_PRIVATE_PRESENTATION: case TYPE_VOICE_INTERACTION: case TYPE_ACCESSIBILITY_OVERLAY: case TYPE_QS_DIALOG: // The window manager will check these. return ADD_OKAY; } return mContext.checkCallingOrSelfPermission(INTERNAL_SYSTEM_WINDOW) == PERMISSION_GRANTED ? ADD_OKAY : ADD_PERMISSION_DENIED; } }
为了解决问题一,DovaToast不得不选择绕过NotificationManagerService的控制,但由于windowToken是NMS生成的, 绕过NMS就无法获取到有效的windowToken,于是作为TYPE_TOAST的DovaToast就可能陷入第四个问题。因此,DToast选择在DovaToast出现 该问题时引入ActivityToast,在DovaToast无法正常展示时创建一个依附于Activity的弹窗展示出来,不过ActivityToast只会展示在当前Activity,不具有跨页面功能。 如果说有更好的方案,那肯定是去获取悬浮窗权限然后改用TYPE_PHONE等类型,但悬浮窗权限往往不容易获取,目前来看恐怕除了微信其他APP都不能保证拿得到用户的悬浮窗权限。
问题五:Android7.1之后,不允许同时展示两个TYPE_TOAST弹窗
DToast的弹窗策略就是同一时间最多只展示一个弹窗,逻辑上就避免了此问题。因此仅捕获该异常。